I was at a dinner last week with Aaron Levie of Box.net, David Sacks of Yammer, Lars Dalgaard of Success Factors, author Geoffrey Moore and about a dozen other reporters.
Their collective goal was like that of a first date: To feed us a nice meal, ply us with wine and hope in our gluttonous haze we’d find enterprise software more sexy.
It was indeed an interesting conversation– in fact, the most interesting part was Dalgaard’s detailed description of his acquisition talks with SAP. I’m not just saying that to continue to mess with Alexia.
He was dishing about how horrified he was initially with the idea of SAP owning his company. He says he “rebelled like a teenager” making what he considered outrageous demands to incentivize the salesforce to sell the less-expensive Success Factors product and forwarding emails to SAP’s Bill McDermott that showed off the most cowboy parts of his corporate culture. His efforts to scare off the stodgy German giant didn’t work. McDermott instead said he wanted more of it.
I’ve heard that kind of thing before somewhere…Oh yes, here. This will be an interesting integration to watch. If things go badly, don’t count on Dalgaard keeping his mouth shut about it anymore than this guy did.
At the end of the dinner, Moore asked why we didn’t write about enterprise software more and half the table almost threw a drink at him. This was, after all, the choir he was preaching too– the rare tech reporters who have continued to do excellent work covering enterprise software even as the consumer world has rocketed in page views, cash and sex appeal.
I mean, the rest of the reporters at the table were the choir. I was a choir-member-turned-sinner. I started out last year with a New Year’s Resolution to cover enterprise more, and I didn’t do a great job of that. In fact, I did a horrible job at it.
But it’s not because I find enterprise boring. It’s because I’m not sure if all the hype is real this time. I covered enterprise software for BusinessWeek back in the days when SAAS was the rage and later, when open source became the rage. I wrote story-after-story about all the buzz phrases everyone is saying now like “consumerization of enterprise software” and the all-glorious implications of doing business in the cloud. I wrote about how the superior business model would mean more grass roots sales, and less of a need for those old school elephant hunting salesmen.
And I wrote about how these companies would disrupt the old guard because they were so much more customer friendly. Customers– to a company– hate most of their installed enterprise software vendors. Hate them with a passion the rest of us reserve for congressmen.
How could this wave not be huge?
The power of industry inertia, that’s how. Installing enterprise systems was so painful and traumatic the first time that replacing them with anything new, no matter how amazing, was a hard sell. It will happen, but it will take time. Only a handful of those SAAS companies became $1 billion-plus winners and only one of the open source ones did: MySQL. And now, that’s owned by database incumbent Oracle.
It was a classic case of over-promising on a trend in the short term and — very likely– under-promising in the long term. But has that “long-term” period begun yet?
It’s similar to where reporters were with consumer Web companies back in 2005 and 2006. People were so burned from all those big dot com promises that they lost their minds at the idea that a Web company could be worth even a couple hundred million dollars, let alone $100 billion.
Only with consumer products, the resurgence was easier to predict, because we can all use them, our friends use them, and we can get the idea of whether something big is really happening. With enterprise products, you have to take analysts’ and customers’ word for it.
I know that change is coming. The world won’t continue to use 1990s apps forever. But I’m still not convinced it’s here yet. Sure most large companies use some cloud-based software. But few run their whole businesses on them. There are an astounding number of stodgy CIOs who still fear the cloud. Dalgaard told the story of literally hiding from the CIO of one company, lest he be kicked out of the building for corrupting the youth.
But there’s at least one big reason this time different from the SAAS mania of the early 2000s: The iPad. IDG reported today that 91% of business and IT professionals use iPads for work, and iPad adoption in IT resistant verticals like healthcare has been staggering as well.
The iPad may change the game in enterprise more than it did on the consumer Web, and do it quickly. You can use the same old clunky enterprise software on a jazzier laptop, but an iPad is a total hardware shift that begs for a redesigned touch-based app. And workers are more likely to adopt business software designed for an iPad, because it’s the shiny new toy that they want more reasons to use.





[...] was easy to excuse those who thought that tablets are to laptops as laptops are to desktops. As Sarah Lacy points out on PandoDaily, it’s not that simple. It’s different than the “SAAS mania of the early 2000s” that ran [...]
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like[...] was easy to excuse those who thought that tablets are to laptops as laptops are to desktops. As Sarah Lacy points out on PandoDaily, it’s not that simple. It’s different than the “SAAS mania of the early 2000s” that ran [...]
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like[...] was easy to excuse those who thought that tablets are to laptops as laptops are to desktops. As Sarah Lacy points out on PandoDaily, it’s not that simple. It’s different than the “SAAS mania of the early 2000s” that ran [...]
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like[...] was easy to excuse those who thought that tablets are to laptops as laptops are to desktops. As Sarah Lacy points out on PandoDaily, it’s not that simple. It’s different than the “SAAS mania of the early 2000s” that ran [...]
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like[...] makes “consumerization of enterprise” finally a reality? Part of it is the revolutionary reach of the iPad in organizations making people want dramatically new UIs. The consumer kids have taken over the [...]
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like[...] week, Pando Daily Editor-In-Chief Sarah Lacy wrote an update about the state of the enterprise software market. For as long as there has been an internet, it [...]
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe iPad is the result of a level of flexibility that the web can now deliver. Peripherals are irrelevant. The web is the consistent factor and virtual workforce will be the norm. I have not had a brick and mortar business since 1999 and will never go back. We build cloud based enterprise systems for the web at a fraction of the cost of "traditional" enterprise systems. And because the web is so much more stable as a platform, updates and enhancements are cheep and easy, making customer responsiveness unparalleled. I published my first software at 17. I have worked for both John Deere Corporation and ADP in enormous enterprise systems. I will never go back.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAbsolutely agree that iPad (and IOS devices generally) will open up the enterprise. I've seen this happening first hand at a few companies - http://www.zedscore.com/2011/09/how-apple-are-storming-enterprise-from.html
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHope you keep the resolution this year! Your last paragraph is the lede, of course (why bury it?) and a ton of startups are focused in this HW / Mobile / BYOD shift, with the iPhone and now the iPad as game changers in the enterprise. The key questions we hear being asked by our enterprise customers: can we use these new devices to meet our goals in new & profitable ways that help us compete? Certainly worth some more column inches, no?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIn my opinion, the biggest barrier to widespread enterprise adoption of mission-critical cloud apps has nothing to do with desktops, laptops or iPads. The biggest barrier is simply the cloud part. The fact is: internet access still SUCKS. Whether it's a Wifi connection or a DSL or T1 or even OC192...inevitably, your internet WILL go down. What then? All your cloud apps are literally dead in the water. Now, don't misunderstand me: I'm a huge proponent of and believer in cloud apps for business, but until and unless the "internet is the air", it's simply not going to happen.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAgree that it is a risk that needs to be managed/mitigated. The vast majority of these new cloud services are hosted by just a handful of companies (Amazon, Google, Rackspace, etc.). Placing mission critical services in the hands of hosting companies that had multiple newsworthy occurances of significant downtime in 2011 is a non-starter. Assume that's not an issue, attempting to manage connectivity issues with dozens/hundreds of pieces of non-standardized equipment could proove overwhelming for an IT group already stressed by the current econony. And there's currently not a lot of fat in the budget to just buy everyone an iPad. Even if a SMB decides to host their own services, and to support employee owned equipment (i.e. iPads), neither the infrastructure nor the bandwidth to get mission critical services up an running are free.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI disagree. Systems go down everywhere for all sorts of reasons. There are a lot more ways to get to the internet than there are servers available for me to purchase and locally maintain. Redundancy is what matters most. There is no more redundant backbone than the internet. Everything has the capability to go down. The question is, who can do the best job of keeping it up and how many choices do I have if there is a problem.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMS has a huge window (no pun intended) of oppurtunity here. My peers an I (50-250 person AEC firms) have been holding off on widespread tablet rollouts until we see what different HW vendors have to offer with Win8. Enterprise IT is not ignorning the tablet/SAAS oppurtunities. However, being able to leverage existing software workflows with new tablet based interfaces is what most have been waiting to see become available.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAs I mentioned recently on a similar, but different site... I think the real opportunity for massive success is small business (my definition: 1-20 employees). Its how the majority of working individuals worldwide are employed and in dire need (I believe ) of solutions that help them successfully compete against the companies indirectly referenced in this article that companies such as Yammer, Box, and SuccessFactors targets.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOne barrier for enterprise adoption of iOS is the app store centric distribution model http://developer.apple.com/programs/ios/distribute.html. If I'm a medium sized company and I build an iOS app for all my warehouse supervisors, I don't want to have to put that on the app store so everyone on Earth can see it. At the same time, ad hoc distribution is a pain and I am limited to just 100 installs. And the enterprise/B2B option I believe is limited to companies with more than 500 employees and seems to require detailed Apple interaction. But it is exactly the medium sized, < 500 employee businesses that have the both the flexibility (vs. huge companies which have giant, long term software/infrastructure inertia) and the dollars (vs. tiny companies) to invest in this technology. The older device companies that target these markets have done a lot of work making their devices ruggedized (for shop, warehouse, trucking, and worksite environments), remotely-administrable, easily imaged (so you can just plug in a new device and get it into the correct configuration and software setup), and fully locked down to a single app (so employees aren't watching YouTube). While they are far behind the user experience of an iOS device, and usually also cost a lot more, these benefits are really hard to walk away from. I think if Apple really wants enterprise iOS use to take off, they could do a lot to encourage it. I think they are doing just fine in the consumer world though, so the enterprise world will have to try to fit into those approaches.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThere are great ways for companies to take advantage of iPad and iPhone in the enterprise. You are incorrect in stating that companies need 500 or more employees to join the iOS Developer Enterprise Program (see http://www.apperian.com/apple-opens-ios-developer-enterprise-program-to-all-companies/). This policy was changed back in September 2010, and Apple has improved the program since then to support customer visible devices in public as well (in specific situations). There are great ways for businesses of any size to create fully customized "App Catalogs" with products such as EASE (see http://www.apperian.com/ease/). The development environment (native XCode) is vastly enhanced, and with solutions such as Appcelerator, Phonegap, Sencha Touch, Rhomobile, and the Mono Project (to name a few) there are numerous ways to create great native apps. Apple's support for device management protocols and inclusion of a device management solution in Lion (Apple Profile Manager) also helps out. I agree that there is always room for improvement, but there are great options today in this environment.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWow, thank you for this update, I had not seen this. I am not directly involved in iOS dev myself but some people I work with are... guess I am out of the loop!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAs far as I understand it, the idea behind consumerization of IT is that it does two things: it forces the enterprise to cope with managing what were formerly considered unmanageable devices within the workplace, and it requires consumers to bring their own electronics into the workplace. The iPad only works on one of these levels: it does allow a significant number of employees to enter the workplace with their own technology which they would prefer to use over their own workstations, but they are still manageable, as they require enterprises to install a black box server of Apple's to manage the devices. This story doesn't mention that the reason why most enterprises don't change is since it will either cost a significant amount of money to train employees to use their ecosystem of applications over multiple devices, or since many enterprises have many custom interconnected applications that are built and enterprise-tested for Windows/Internet Explorer. While Sarah questions if the hype is real, I think that most companies realize that from a strategic point of view, technology will become a new strength that some organizations either embrace or they don't. Just like supply chain efficiencies, a great information system will enhance some companies (like hotels that know what every guess who ever stayed there prefers their room temperature to be like, and what accoutrements they need), but will also hurt companies that don't want to adapt (a Fortune company with many legacy IS systems that updates them to keep the company running). I would argue, without a shred of proof, that this will be a continuing trend: some companies will update software to allow iPads, and newer technologies to work exceedingly well with their systems... and some companies won't. And most companies at the forefront will be aggregating this content to their employees through web-based applications. (An iPad application, like a Windows application, is within a walled garden: if you create an iOS-only application, it's forcing the company to invest significant resources maintaining the application and all subsequent applications.)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likethe ipad could be a gateway drug... because a lot of people are following it closely. whether that leads to hardware and/or software salvation... eh. who knows.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJust to throw a wrench in the commenters' relentless naysaying here is some real data: http://www.asymco.com/2012/01/10/enter-prise/ Apple's share of enterprise revenue doubled in 2010 and then nearly doubled again in 2011. The bump in 2011 was mostly due to iPad sales.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Liketoo legit to quit. #hammertime
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThere's some interesting information in that report, but at the same time there's a lot wrong with it. Overoptimistic assessment of Apple sales growth, failure to consider the possibility of increasing maturity of Android devices disrupting iPad sales, failure to take into account the impact that Windows 8 will have on the market, both mobile and desktop, failure to consider the impact of Ultrabooks, and next-generation hybrids. Yes, I know that iPad sales have been phenomenal, but for the longest time they were the only game in town. Now with iPad being undercut by Kindle Fire at the bottom end, and in direct competition with viable alternates running Android for the first time, the game will change. Almost all of the enterprise sales growth in Apple has been walking in through the front door or coming out of departmental budgets rather than being purchased by IT, I don't know how much more capacity that is in that particular sales channel, but I'm reasonably confident in saying that unless Apple developers and enterprise sales channel it is not going to see the same level of continued growth that many people are forecasting. You get the picture?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIf every device is just a thin client to Enterprise touch-optimized services, then why iPad?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAll the job functions which requires an enterprise employee to be mobile (e.g. a Sales guy or a technician on the field) would see increased up take of iPads/tablets and hence tablet based applications.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThat's impossible.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJust commenting to follow this comment thread. (Is there a way to do that without commenting?)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe most productive iPad usage from the business and IT professionals that I know of is to wow the customers with some fancy presentations, on iPad. Enterprise software takes a lot of effort and resources to write, and the rage is just not there yet. My guess is that someone, or some enterprise software company, have to take the risk and get the ball rolling by publishing an enterprise software. However, enterprise software companies write softwares to profit. The rage is for all those game and social apps now, and even those apps are struggling for profit. How would any software company expect its enterprise app to make a profit? Additionally, the iOS app store charges a hefty commission. If the software I am using at the office costed my company $3,000 a seat. Then the same software need to be priced at north of $4,000 to maintain the same profit margin. Doesn't it sound ridiculous? That's how the world works though.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIt should be obvious that you wouldn't charge for the app itself; the iPad should contain a client to connect to an application hosted elsewhere. The apps in question are more than likely multiuser and deal with visualizing and updating data hosted in a single remote database. So... charge out the nose for the server application and give the client app away for free (or charge a paltry fee if that's what it takes to appear more enterprisey).
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeChange your application, so that its available for free, but is hooked with a service which requires payment. Not a big deal
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeUnless you are a manager (a high level manager with a secretary) you need a keyboard. Notice that hasn't changed in oh 50+ years (going back to memos created on a typewriter), the good old keyboard. The IPad is missing that, yes you can hook it up to one, but then you have a really thin desktop... but now not a very good one. People conduct business using phones and keyboards (to send emails and correspondence). The also get non-managerial tasks accomplished at a desk in a cubicle or an office (because they need space for files, either real or electronic because that is what represents 'work accomplished'). Making business apps touch-based will not improve productivity if I don't have a keyboard (a real one not a on screen image). Why do I need a mobile device if I must be at a desk next to my phone to get any work done anyway? If I am at my desk, why am I going to attempt to get my work done on an IPad (or any tablet)? Are all of you producing Pando Daily using IPads? If not why?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMany people working in warehouses, shops, worksites, trucking, etc. use "brick" type mobile devices to do work, mostly involved with scanning and lightweight data entry using onscreen keyboards or 10-key pads built into these devices. This is actually a huge user community that gets by just fine without a full keyboard. But for anything related to continuous data entry, you are absolutely right -- a real keyboard is still indispensable.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYou don't have a phone at your desk anymore - you have *just* a mobile phone. And for a lot of large enterprises (perhaps not yours though - the change will take time like anything in enterprise) this shift - mobile only, BYOP, BYOL, etc. is starting in pockets with the executives and highly mobile groups (sales or internal IT). Eventually it will spread to the middle managers in HR and Finance as more companies become WFH or distributed.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like"IDG reported today that 91% of business and IT professionals use iPads for work," what you meant to say was "IDG reported today that 91% of business and IT professionals WHO OWN THEM use iPads for work communication," The point is, that while there is no doubt that iPads are extremely popular they are still very limited in their business application and that the death of the PC has been grossly exaggerated. Absolutely, change is coming is no doubt about that, but for every story that is written about the successful adoption of consumer technologies in the enterprise there are 1000 unwritten stories that say nothing changed today. regards Simon
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like