So, the great Wikipedia blackout has begun. The front page of the English language edition of the encyclopedia now displays a notice explaining the chilling effects of SOPA.
The goal: to educate Wikipedia’s users on a serious political issue.
The result?
Well… here are just a few of the reactions (as collated by herpderpedia) from students who rely on Wikipedia to copy and paste for assist with their coursework…
Awareness accomplished, Wikipedia. Awareness accomplished. (Click the image for even more.)
(H/t @andrewpbrett)





[...] Pando Daily [...]
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNot sure if trolling or just plain stupid.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI know this might be a bit off topic but reading all those tweets reminded me of that saying "every country gets the government it deserves". People, in general, don't care. There is a good reason dictatorships exist, it's because most people just don't care until the situation is so bad it can't be fixed. This SOPA debate is a really good metaphor for societies in general.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNot off topic at all. The fact that so many of these "students" did not take time to conduct even the most cursory investigation of the issue (even though it was only one click away) does not say much for their prowess as students.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like[...] is full of SOPA related thoughts, and it is apparently the only thing PandoDaily is writing about today. In fact, we’re going the anti-blackout route and publishing even more content [...]
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAll the posts are hilarious, from the misunderstanding of what has actually happened to Wikipedia (basic reading comprehension fail.) to the entitled rage of removing a service they pay nothing for but apparently rely on extensively. I love it all. I feed on those tears. I might not be in the states, but hopefully the revolt over SOPA/PIPA will make it clear to other governments that this sort of shenanigans won't be stood for.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis is how world class blogging is done folks, a credit to the civilization Paul Carr clearly cherishes and works to protect: 1. cut and paste selectively retweeted teenage rants 2. snidely suggest teenagers are somehow less informed than ever before in history and our future is at risk 3. make brilliant point about Wikipedia's actions without once referring to Wikipedia's directors own thoughts on their choice (which are displayed to every US user) This post is different than these selectively chosen, teenage, self centered, hormone-induced, ill-informed, 'soap Wikipedia' tweets.....how?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like1) You speak as if only "selective" re-tweeting would facilitate this point being made. I'm sure there were thousands of similar "teenage rants" to choose from. 2) Is it snide to suggest that students for whom user-edited Wikipedia is their primary reference material are less resourceful and more apt to parrot inaccuracies? No. Is it wrong to maintain that those who would launch profane tirades in a public forum trumpeting their own inadequacies do not necessarily inspire our confidence? No. The fact that you assume these must be teenagers when no such distinction was made says all that needs to be said. I'd be willing to bet a good percentage of these rants were college students, which makes it even more tragic. 3) Obviously the purpose of the post was not to comment on the Wikipedia directors' motivations, so he didn't. Perhaps that has been ably covered in the dozens of other SOPA-related articles on this blog, perhaps even the one he linked to for your edification. I, for one, would feel deprived if sarcasm were removed from the blogger's arsenal. You, apparently, do not see it that way, and that’s OK.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likethat's pretty funny.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhat's Javascript?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHopefully some of them will figure out how to use a browser and disable JavaScript to access the site. The real hilarity will come the next day when nothing on the web actually works and no one will tell them how to enable JavaScript!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like1) Spam Escape and It won't pop up the Blackout when you first load the page. 2) Disable JavaScript. Also here are some other sites following suit in the protest. http://chrisacky.posterous.com/sopa-highights-the-roundup
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe schools around here black out Wikipedia in the first place - I wonder if WikiLeaks is redacted as well...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeCall to revolution.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeActually, you can still access Wikipedia by disabling javascript on your browser.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeor just look at the Cached page.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeSomething similar should have been done for the NDAA : lock a few well known politicians up, indefinitely, and without trial. There's really no reason to be cheerful when SOPA gets blocked because it's just a matter of time before another bill gets introduced. Everyone needs to start thinking about what exactly is going on, what the risks are and what needs to be done to change it.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMy son just texted me from school saying they were all talking about wikipedia blackout, SOPA, PITA and the free internet now. Even the teachers. Thats a first ever for them, so yes. Awareness accomplished.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeExcellent.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI bet that most of those brats tweeted "I'm the only one who didn get an iPhone/iPad/car etc", So screw them!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYou know what would be better? A 24 hour misinformation. Wikipedia editors just alter articles to put in complete garbage. Only students that know their subjects / do real research get a grade. /curmudgeon
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeA 24 hour blackout today, to prevent a permanent one in the future. How is that not a good investment?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI think this is the best comment I have seen so far in the debate!!! Good thinking!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI'd click "like" if I could.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLIKE.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeExactly. I agree completely with Wikipedia and I donate every year.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI wonder how many of the people complaining have donated to Wikipedia during the fundraising drives, I wonder how many of them have even updated, corrected, wrote or contributed to an article or entry. If none of the above applies to these people they don't really have as much of a right to complain because they are not active participants in the community.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe saddest part is that if they took all of three minutes to actually read the page, they'd realize how to bypass the blackout.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOur future is indeed in great hands... They didn't even read the 3-line paragraph before tweeting. This makes me so sad... I think someone should set up a twitter bot to answer those kids when they ask "Why is wikipedia blacked out?" with something like "Because it fucking can!". Grrrrr....
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likehoping alota these urban kids actually read that paragraph to actually see what is going on and why... awareness spread to kids who couldn't care less.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAlthough SOPA and PIPA are not kosher, I agree with #dickcostolo that blacking out a global business for a US only law is silly. You can STILL access wikipedia by simply disabling javascript in your browser, navigating to wikipedia and searching as usual. Go ahead, complete that homework!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like@ash Did you just advise people to break US/ or European law and "bypass a technological protection measure without permission"? I think you maybe did. Still think laws are silly? http://www.inbrief.co.uk/intellectual-property/copyright-technological-protection-measures.htm
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNo he didn't http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Learn_more "Is it still possible to access Wikipedia in any way? Yes. During the blackout, Wikipedia is accessible on mobile devices and smart phones. You can also view Wikipedia normally by disabling JavaScript in your browser, as explained on this Technical FAQ page. Our purpose here isn't to make it completely impossible for people to read Wikipedia, and it's okay for you to circumvent the blackout. We just want to make sure you see our message. "
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI'm amazed at some of these responses...and it makes me wonder, how many people will actually stop to read and educate themselves on what's going on? Or have they already clicked away to Tweet their frustration? That's not to say this move is #Fail no Wikipedia's part. I admire them for it. (Heck, I've followed suit in my own small way by taking my site dark). I guess it just saddens me to see some of these responses...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDamn! Someone's going to have to go out in the cold, learn the dewey decimal system, and operate a microfiche reader. I'm feeling so old! Youngsters these days!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJust go to en.m.wikipedia.org, it is the mobile version of the site and it will not be blacked out. I hate losing Wikipedia for a day, but, for SOPA, I will deal with it. SOPA is evil.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like"imagine a world without free knowledge"? They are making grandiose asses of themselves. Jimmy Wales is as petulant as a school girl. Better to withhold than to think.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeGrandiose or not, the point is spot on. People rely on it as a service, and its showing how it affects peoples lives, and maybe bring more awareness to SOPA, and hopefully educate people a little more.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIf those people can be bothered to read for a couple of minutes, which, considering that they ARE visiting Wikipedia for god's sake, shouldn't be an issue. Doubtful though, I have high hopes for most of the internet, not so much for the derps that inhabit it.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe thing is until recently knowledge wasn't as free or easily accessible. Sure, there were libraries, but it wasn't as easy as typing in a link.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe last Tweet is unintentionally hilarious since she misspelled "cue."
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAnd.... we have Max Woolf.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDitto :D
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like