This Tweet Is Available In The Following Countries:

As we just wrote in the PandoTicker, Twitter has announced that they now have the capability to hide tweets from users based on the locality of the user. While deleting tweets has always been possible on a global level, the tweets can now be deleted in one area of the world, and still be visible in the rest of the world. Immediately, this brings up some interesting questions.

What happens during the next revolution?

Let’s throw out a hypothetical situation that isn’t exactly atypical. A country in the Middle East, Qumar (hat tip West Wing) is authoritarian, but allows access to Twitter. The people of this nation have begun to rise up against the Qumari government, and are using Twitter to organize. The Qumari government decides that this organizational tactic is harmful to the structure of the regime, and moves to crack down on tweeting.

Suddenly, the Qumari government issues orders to Twitter, ordering them to censor certain tweets. The tweets, according to Twitter’s new ability, are removed from the Qumari version of Twitter, and the protests lose their ability to organize. The revolution faces a major setback.

How does this affect developers and third-party applications?

Twitter is able to censor tweets, and will theoretically be able to do it on third-party clients as well. This makes sense, as it wouldn’t be a very effective feature if it left that loop hole open. What happens when a third-party client – say, again, in Qumar – masks itself as a client in a neighboring kingdom that is not censoring tweets. The people of Qumar now are viewing the tweets, and the Qumari government then moves to shut down Twitter in the country altogether.

This is bad for Twitter (it loses money), the people (they lose a source of communication), the developer (they lose the trust of the Twitter engineering teams) and the Qumari government (the people then move to less transparent means of communication). Most of all, other regimes will look at Twitter as incapable of censoring to their demands.

Is this a step towards Twitter launching in China?

Earlier this year (or late last year), Twitter co-founder and Square CEO Jack Dorsey travelled to China. While the details of what he discussed were not made public, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist that he was there to talk about more than Square. What is there to talk about in China, regarding Twitter? Well, the launch of Twitter in China.

If Twitter is planning a launch in China, the Chinese government will be keeping a close eye on Twitter’s ability to censor material that the Chinese government deems ‘inappropriate’ or ‘threatening’. Twitter didn’t have that capability yesterday, but it certainly is moving in the right direction as of today. I’m sure Mao would be pleased.

To be clear, this isn’t just a “let’s all gang up on Twitter” post. Instead, I’m trying to point out some of the big flaws in this plan. At the same time, I understand that Twitter is in-between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, they are a business and it makes sense to reach as many people as possible. On the other hand, they are being used as a utility by more and more people and should be treated as such.

With those qualifier being clearly states, I end up agreeing with Chris Dixon:

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

[...] seguro de que Mao estaría contento”, escribe Trevor Gilbert en Pando Daily. Y The Guardian, por su parte, se pregunta si esta medida podría usarse para bloquear tuits que [...]

[...] seguro de que Mao estaría contento”, escribe Trevor Gilbert en Pando Daily. Y The Guardian, por su parte, se pregunta si esta medida podría usarse para bloquear tuits que [...]

[...] to approve with internal law during a risk of a employees confronting prosecution. [Twitter Blog, PandoDaily, Guardian, MarketingLand, [...]

Twitter wants to grow and it will have to abide by the law book of rulers. These rulers are scared to see the powers of social media in the hands of common man. 2012 will be a defining year as we go ahead. Don't you think so :)

What is preferable? For Twitter to pull out of any country that requires it to provide blocking, or for Twitter to put in place measures that enables them to comply with the letter of local law, whilst leaving enough loopholes to violate the spirit of those laws? A Twitter with toothless censorship policies will do more for free speech in places like China than no Twitter at all, and pushing the boundaries of communication in places like China is the best way to degrade the obstacles to free speech.

There's more chance of me buying Google (paying with container loads of 100 US dollar bills) than of Twitter launching in China.

I don't see the point in this announcement unless they see a pathway into China. I can't think of any other market big enough or oppressive enough to justify this level of concession.

The they're crazy. They'll get eaten alive in China by competitors and the government, and flayed in the US for their compromises.

Twitter confirmed me that they don't use ip geoblocking. Instead, the limited content is based on the users' country settings. If a user changes its country from Qumar to the US, he/she will see the blocked tweet/account again. In the end, the solution is much better than what one could have expected. More here (but you'll need to use Google translate ;)) http://netzwertig.com/2012/01/27/regionale-sperrung-von-tweets-twitter-animiert-anwender-die-zensur-zu-umgehen/

....There is no excuse for blocking/limting content in any country ...NONE...There should be no need to change the users country setting or any setting to see content...

There should be no country in the world that doesn't treat freedom of speech as the highest good either. Unfortunately, there are many.

Thanks for covering this !!!! ...."Our Great Twitter whom we continue to create millions in value for by adding content on a daily basis cares nothing about freedom of speech ....No surprise there....Twitter is a traditional internet Corp who's primary goal is to Extract as much Value from the"Community" as possible so that it can be leveraged into hunders of millions of dollars in revenues...In this traditional Corp frame work "Community" and "Freedom" of speech are degraded to their lowest possible denominators. We are developing www.kleemi.com as "Community" first alternative to Google, Twitter, and Facebook. The application is in alpha and some of the current features are : Cutting Edge Meta Search Engine, Fully Integrated News Reader and Micro Blogging service.

well parties can use code words that they set up on other sites that can beat the monitors and also hackers from the respective coutries can always build a similar network from a source code to keep the revolution moving...

Which countries regulations does the internet service has to abide by? What is considered lawful in one jurisdiction is not necessarily the case in another jurisdiction (e.g. insulting the royalty in Thailand)

sad trend for sites that go public...profit over users is always the end result..

It will be interesting to see if some countries' law are more legal than others, in Twitters opinion..