With Millions Of New Records, Inflection Delivers One-Two Punch To Ancestry.com

Inflection may be the hottest Silicon Valley company you’ve never heard of. That’s largely because they’ve invested all their time in just building a big business, and almost none of it in talking about it.

True to that culture, rather than just tell me they’d amassed one of the largest databases of information about people on the Web– flush with hundreds of millions more records they’re announcing today– they showed me. They sent me an email including a PDF of my parents’ wedding announcement, and the census records of all eight of my great-grandparents, dating back to the 1850s.

Wow. Always grabs my attention when a company knows more about me than I do.

Inflection collects everything from court documents, census records, newspapers, yearbooks, phone books, business filings and more to build its own proprietary big–  really BIG — data platform all about you. They have more than five billion records and counting, some from just digitizing public records and some of that information they’ve purchased.

The company has built two branded verticals on top of that massive platform: One called PeopleSmart that enables you to search public records, and one called Archives.com for family history. Both charge a fraction of what competitors charge, but importantly they do charge something to hundreds of thousands of members. “We believe there’s huge value in this data,” says CEO Matthew Monahan.

Archives.com just got a lot more powerful: It is announcing this week the addition of hundreds of millions of family tree records from FamilySearch International. Archives.com is the first website to make this particular data-set available outside the Mormon Church. It’s one of the largest family tree collections ever published online, increasing the number of trees on the site fifty-fold immediately. And this isn’t user-generated data; it has been painstakingly vetted by expert genealogists.

This week the 1930 census is also going live at Archives.com, including three million images. Ancestry.com also has this data-set, but it charges $300 a year, versus $40 a year for Archives.com. Six million more images from the census years dating back to 1790 will become available on Archives.com in the next two months. The company describes it as a “goldmine of genealogical information with names, ages, birth locations and family relationships” enabling people to trace back several generations of their family trees.

This is the second in a recent one-two punch at Ancestry.com. In addition to an limited-time exclusive on this data, the National Archives & Records Administration picked Inflection to develop the official US Government website displaying all the information from the 1940 census, scheduled to be released in April 2012. This is a very big deal in genealogical circles and will vaunt Archives.com in name recognition and credibility in the community. “We were sort of like, ‘We won? Really?’” says Monahan.

Matthew Monahan’s brother Brian Monahan started Inflection in his Harvard dorm room in 2006. True to cliche, he dropped out and moved to Silicon Valley to build it, roping in his brother — also a drop-out who’d already sold one company– to run it with him. Contrary to cliche, the company is profitable and growing 70% year-over-year with more than 140 employees.

Inflection is one of three genealogy companies to watch in an escalating three-way battle for family tree supremacy. The giant of the space is publicly-traded Ancestry.com. Ancestry’s edge has long been its ties with the Mormon community, but those have been fraying in recent years. Several reports and sources tell us that the Church wants their data to be more open than Ancestry is willing to make it. So the church has been increasingly willing to make deals with outsiders, like Israel’s MyHeritage and Silicon Valley’s Inflection.

Both MyHeritage and Inflection are nimbler and taking aim at Ancestry from two different angles. MyHeritage has a far greater volume of profiles and users and is much more social. But it has lacked historical records– a weakness the company has recently been trying to shore up with its recent acquisition of FamilyLink.

Meanwhile, Inflection’s playbook is more similar to Ancestry’s, but it dramatically undercuts Ancestry on price. That’s why today’s announcement of the family tree info from FamilySearch International is so important: Inflection is increasingly closing the gap in terms of the size of the underlying database, and as a Valley-based company it is more technologically savvy.

Ancestry can’t really fight against either threat very well, in my view. Social just isn’t in the company’s DNA, and that’s nearly impossible to successfully bolt onto a pre-existing product. If Google is having challenges with that, Ancestry.com most certainly will. Meanwhile, Ancestry is struggling to grow users as it tries to tap into the more “arm-chair genealogist” market, with a splashy TV ad campaign and a sponsorship of NBC’s “Who Do You Think You Are?” Inflection’s dramatically lower price point isn’t going to help, and the win of digitizing the 1940 Census gives them a big boost of credibility and momentum.

Ancestry still has the home-field advantage as the only Salt Lake City-based company of the three. It may not be cool to be a Mormon on the campaign trail, but MyHeritage and Inflection both know they have to win there to win this market. Look for the marketing and data slug-fest to continue in Salt Lake City as these players fight it out.

Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

Fact check, the Ancestry,com subscription rate for US records is FAR LESS than the $300 quoted in this article. Any resource who can beat Ancestry's arrogant and sometimes undependable service is welcome!

I had a membership to Ancestry.com once but I always thought their fee was too high. It bothered me, too, that they would welcome my fifty years of research (with nothing but appreciation) and charge others to access it. I find fault with their search filters--they ask for specific data where possible and disregard it in bringing up matches. They never responded to my questions. I fell in love with Mucavo immediately.and can hardly wait for Inflection. P.S. I care little how many dead people the Mormons baptize to insure their entrance to Heaven.

These genealogy sites combine their data with public records to create scarily deep dossiers about people. Think your research on Ancestry.com is private? They aggregate this stuff with all the data-scraping about you in public records. Your family members are dragged into the details about you. Even if you try to keep a low profile on the Internet, if someone puts you into a family tree on one of these sites, you've been further embedded into the data-scraping. And then they market it to anyone who pays, without concern for motivation or purpose. They could care less about providing genealogy services and all the world about selling your data... Birth details, financial details, family details, contact details.

"Archives.com just got a lot more powerful: It is announcing this week the addition of hundreds of millions of family tree records from FamilySearch International ... this isn’t user-generated data; it has been painstakingly vetted by expert genealogists." I question how painstakingly "hundreds of millions" of family trees could have been vetted. This sort of information is almost useless unless each fact cites a source. But one can hope, so I'll check it out. I've played around on Anecdote.com - I mean Ancestry.com - and the user-submitted trees are terrible. People just make shit up, and the concept of giving a source is lost on 99% of them.

All right, Inflection!

Reblogged this on richard.h.kelly and commented: Awesome up and coming company - Inflection.com. Big data, beware.

Also worth mentioning in this space is http://mocavo.com/ , a TechStars grad and a free genealogy search engine that stands to succeed no matter who wins the fight between Ancestry and Inflection, especially if that fight goes on for a long time.

Actually Ancestry.com also has a free genealogy search engine that searches across the entire web and its already built into their global search.

Yeah, I'm not buying it. Both of these services do the same as many other dotcoms in this space. How many of us have been burned by paying the fees and seeing old data, incomplete data, or really nothing of value? With my fairly unique first and last name, it should be easy to identify me, yet the content is NOT me. Since I'm sure I'm not the only person who has experienced this, how does this industry plan to change their algorithms to be more precise? I feel like I paid to do a Lycos search... #fail

Jeanne, you talk about paying the fees. Did you look at the site at all? Not only do they offer a free 7 day trial membership, but you can also see what records they have available before you join, in case they don't have what you are looking for. I guess if all else fails, you could always call and ask too.

hrm… hiring .NET engineers, sounds like a very questionable techonolgy platform choice.

It's only questioned by people who know very little about technology platforms.

Great article Sarah! It'll be interesting to see if Ancestry can maintain its dominance or if more agile players will eat its lunch. Keep up the good work with your reporting!

Based on their record of hiring huge rockstars like Peter Merholz (http://www.peterme.com/2012/01/09/i-have-a-new-job-vp-of-user-experience-at-inflection/), this company and team is going places. IPO anyone?

A well-told story on the team at Inflection.

You should ask Ancestry.com if they are using the information submitted by customers to surreptitiously baptize their deceased ancestors as required by the Mormon religion. Of course, the customers aren't advised about this.

Easy answer. No. Ancestry isn't owned by or affiliated with the Mormon church.

Thats the craziest thing I've ever heard, where do you get your random facts - obviously not well sourced? Ancestry.com is in no way part of the Mormon church. And Mormons don't just willy-nilly baptize every person they can, they only baptize their direct family. Funny you bring that up though, if you read carefully the article says the Mormon church is actually giving Inflection, aka Archives.com, their records: "Archives.com just got a lot more powerful: It is announcing this week the addition of hundreds of millions of family tree records from FamilySearch International." FamilySearch International = Mormon church So are you now worried the Mormon church is going to take all of the new Inflections family tree info they get from users? So silly.

So are you guys sock puppets for the Mormon church, or simply .. uninformed?: From today's Telegraph: "Mormon Church apologises for posthumous baptisms of Holocaust victims The Mormon Church has apologised after members of the religion performed posthumous baptisms into Mormonism of the dead Jewish parents of famed Nazi hunter and Holocaust survivor Simon Wiesenthal." http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/world-war-2/9083344/Mormon-Church-apologises-for-posthumous-baptisms-of-Holocaust-victims.html Ancestry.com CEO Paul Allen is a Mormon, and has started numerous Mormon-related companies in the past: "In 1990, Paul B. Allen (not to be confused with Microsoft cofounder Paul G. Allen) and Dan Taggart, two Brigham Young University graduates, founded Infobases and began offering Latter-day Saints (LDS) publications on floppy disks." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestry.com So, Sarah Lacy, why not be a real journalist, and ask ancestry.com what is really going on?

Thank GOODNess! After the starting of Ancestry, and them asking people to upload their personal data, then taking it as their own, as I know personally,locking it behind their pay firewalls, and being used as I and others were, go get em, Ancestry is not worth your time, or money.